Skip to main content

Zoth: The Admin Key Proxy Hijack (March 2025)

On March 21, 2025, Zoth, a protocol focused on bridging liquidity between TradFi and DeFi, was exploited for approximately $8.4 million. The incident highlights the critical vulnerability of privileged credentials and the dangers of combining proxy upgradeability with a single point of failure in key management.

Technical Overview​

Zoth utilizes an upgradeable proxy architecture for its vaults (specifically the USD0PPSubVaultUpgradeable contract). This allows the protocol to update its logic without migrating user funds to a new address. However, the authority to perform this upgrade is held by a "deployer" or "admin" address.

The vulnerability was not in the smart contract code logic itself, but in the operational security of the administrative keys governing the contracts.

Exploit Mechanism: The Malicious Upgrade​

The attack followed a sophisticated path from credential theft to logic substitution.

  1. Credential Compromise: The attacker gained unauthorized access to Zoth's deployer/admin private key (potentially through phishing, social engineering, or a localized system breach).
  2. Proxy Hijack: Using the compromised key, the attacker called the upgradeTo() function on the USD0PPSubVaultUpgradeable proxy contract.
  3. Malicious Implementation: The attacker pointed the proxy toward a custom malicious implementation contract they had previously deployed. This new logic contained a function that bypassed all previous withdrawal constraints and "liquidated" the vault's assets.
  4. Asset Siphoning: The attacker drained 8,851,750 USD0++ tokens, which were immediately swapped for DAI and then ETH before being moved off-chain.
  5. Velocity of Attack: The entire process—from upgrade to final bridge exit—was completed in minutes, outpacing the protocol's manual response capabilities.

Why This Matters (The "Administrative Invariant")​

The Zoth exploit demonstrates that Access Control is the ultimate Invariant. No matter how many audits a protocol's logic undergoes, if the "root" key can replace that logic entirely, the audits only verify a temporary state. In 2025, security researchers are seeing an increase in attacks that bypass formal code verification by simply rewriting the code on-chain via stolen administrative power.

Mitigation Strategies​

  • Multi-Signature Governance: Administrative functions, especially upgradeTo(), must never be held by a single EOA (Externally Owned Account). A 3-of-n multisig (e.g., Safe) is the industry standard for upgrade authority.
  • Timelock Enforcement: All administrative changes should be processed through a Timelock contract. This introduces a mandatory delay (e.g., 48 hours) between the scheduling of an upgrade and its execution, giving the community and security monitors time to detect and respond to a compromise.
  • Hardware Security Modules (HSM): Key holders should use institutional-grade hardware modules that require physical validation for ogni transaction, mitigating the risk of digital credential theft.
  • Separation of Concerns: Split administrative roles. The address allowed to change the oracle shouldn't be the same address allowed to upgrade the vault logic.

Conclusion​

The $8.4M Zoth incident is a sobering reminder that Operational Security (OpSec) is Smart Contract Security. In an ecosystem of upgradeable contracts, the chain of trust ends at the private key. For security researchers, this underscores the importance of evaluating not just the code in the vault, but the hands that hold the keys to the upgrade portal.